RTCC logo

UN climate talks: Why is loss and damage so controversial?

By Ed King
RTCC in Doha

The success or failure of the Doha round of climate talks now seem to hinge on a proposal that states are compensated for damage caused by climate change.

It seems fairly straightforward, but is in fact fiendishly complex, as it could involve industrialised nations forking out huge sums of money to give to nations suffering from climate-induced typhoons, hurricanes or rising sea levels.

The Loss and Damage text presented to delegates on Saturday was the subject of a fierce row between the USA and Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) in the early hours of the morning. Some AOSIS delegates reportedly left a meeting with the US in tears.

There is a clear fear among developed nations that they would be asked to foot the bill for any number of extreme weather events. The 2010 Pakistan floods are estimated to have cost the country over $15bn.

Ironically, despite Washington’s opposition to this text, Hurricane Sandy could present it with its own ‘loss and damage’ bill of up to $60bn.

Equally, with the effects of climate change becoming increasingly clear around the world, the feeling persists that a mechanism is needed to ensure emergency funds are distributed to regions on the frontline of global warming.

Currently it is hard for scientists to directly link individual extreme weather events to climate change, and it is also clear that some states may have exacerbated their vulnerability, for instance by building on flood plains or destroying mangrove forests.

Earlier this week I spoke to Saleemul Huq from the International Institute for the Environment and Development, who explained why this issue had cropped up in Doha, and outlined what a potential solution could look like.

Saleemul Huq IIED from Responding to Climate Change on Vimeo.

Read more on: |

Related News

Developing nations blame Australia for loss and damage talks ‘walkout’

Comment: we can’t ignore costs of loss and damage from climate change

Comment: Loss and damage won’t go far enough for climate migrants

‘Loss and damage’ to make or break Doha climate talks

  • nv

    Always interesting to watch great leaders in action. Makes one wonder were the planet is heading, after all,every nation can pull together in understanding the evidence of global warming.There seems to be an unspoken truth that somewhere lies a hidden impulse to defile the benefits of a global understanding not only with climate, economics,and plain human quality. AS we look around the world and witness the disenfranchisement of the human thru greed and politics, shall I name a few current situations that show this to be true, I’d rather not. Oh well, take the recent agreement with China and auto Manufactures producing autos that will have no benefit to climate change or the miners in Africa who want a better quality of life or the cutting of Rain forests. These all have great effect on a particular quality of living. Science is proving that there are ways to handle are problems. We only need to understand each other as being on this one planet. If Kyoto fails to change the old mannerisms then its time to change the leadership.

  • Danny Nye

    What has to be done is simple, Stop pulling fossil fuels out of the ground, Get samples of all of the threatened plant species and build a new economy based on something else. Any other choice is to take the low road and is a sure sign of weakness.