RTCC logo

Star Trek, Piers Morgan and the US climate change debate

By John Parnell

Despite the weird weather and the US election, coverage in the media of climate change fell 2% in 2012.

Hurricane Sandy did its level best to change that at the end of 2012, while President Barack Obama promised it would be top of his ‘to do’ list in his inauguration speech last night.

But if politics and national positions are merely a reflection of what the public want, then perhaps we shouldn’t expect too much too soon.

We’re basing this none-too-scientific prediction on entries into the White House’s We the People online petition website. If your entry attracts 25,000 signatures (the bar used to be set to 100,000) the Administration promises to get in touch.

And last week Hollywood actor Mark Ruffalo (aka Incredible Hulk in the Avengers) opened a new petition calling for a ‘war against climate change‘.

After seven whole days, Ruffalo’s petition has just under 6000 supporters, despite being tweeted to his 370,000 twitter followers. That’s pretty poor – almost embarrassing.

To put this level of support into context here are five petition titles that have gathered more signatures…

Assign NASA to do a feasibility study and conceptual design of the Gen1 USS Enterprise interplanetary spaceship. 7242 signatures

Keep Piers Morgan in the USA. 9958 signatures

Direct the United States Mint to make a single platinum trillion dollar coin! [sic] 11,035 signatures

End to the War on Coal, end the job killing policies of the EPA and require an economic impact analysis of new policies. 28,303 signatures

Make the metric system standard in the United States, instead of the Imperial system. 33,855 signatures

Recount the election! [sic] 69,056 signatures

It is however, beating…

Allow the import and sale of Kinder Surprise Eggs in the United States (4170 signatures).

Regardless of whether media and political silence is to blame thus far, both have a role to play in driving it up the agenda now. Many will look to President Obama to take the lead during his second term – and yesterday’s inauguration speech suggested that’s what he intends to do.

“We will respond to climate change knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. The path to sustainable energy will be long and difficult. The US must lead it and claim its promise,” the President said.

Related News

Morgan Freeman leads Hollywood climate appeal to Obama 1 year ago

Obama: Climate change shift down to my kids 1 year ago

Why climate change was not ignored in the US Presidential debate 1 year ago

Former Blair advisor: Lack of US climate change leadership ‘disappointing’ 2 years ago

  • Claudio

    On the issue of man made pollution creating a rise in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere…a number of options already exist to not only trap the pollution emitted from smoke stacks but also to use that smoke to create energy to power the plant. Solar and wind powered building already exist that reduce the dependence of carbon burning utility companies. The lack of legislation to both require or to switch plants to a better use of energy and production has still not been embraced. Hopefully you will research and possibly invite the founders of one of the companies that has provided the pollution sequestration solution or you will discuss the use of switching off the public grid to reduce demands placed on it.

    Another option would be a far more intellectually challenging jump, but considering the planet as an organism that is self healing, seasons of production from these smoke stacks could also be legislated to allow for those qualities to replenish the damage to nature.