RTCC logo

World’s richest nations ‘failing’ to address climate change

Club of the world’s richest countries says members failing to prevent dangerous climate change, despite efforts to rein in pollution

UK_Parliament_466

By Paul Brown

The world’s richest countries have made some progress since the 1990s in limiting environmental damage. But they have not done enough to prevent catastrophic climate change, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Scientists say that carbon dioxide emissions need to start going down in the next decade to prevent global temperatures reaching dangerous levels. But the OECD predicts they will continue to rise and by 2050 will be 50% higher than they are today.

The 34 OECD countries in the survey are mainly the older mature economies which in the 1970s produced well over half the world’s CO2 emissions from their factories and transport.

Now the OECD share of total world emissions has dropped to 30%, but only because of the vast increase in the energy use of China and other high-growth countries like Brazil, Russia, India, Indonesia and South Africa.  These now account for 40% of global emissions on their own.

More vehicles

There is some good news in the report. Some OECD countries have both increased production and reduced CO2 emissions by introducing renewables and energy efficiency.

The problem for those that fail to do so appears to be political, with countries like Australia and Canada, which have repudiated the Kyoto Protocol, apparently also abandoning most policies to combat climate change.

The report, Environment at a Glance 2013, says that on average there has been progress. Since 1990 there has been a drop of 25% in the amount of energy required to produce a unit of production in member countries, but this is well short of what is needed to safeguard the planet.

The report, which reviews OECD members’ efforts to combat climate change by reducing fossil fuel use, says that the overall energy mix has barely changed in 20 years. There is still an 80% reliance on fossil fuels, although there has been a lot of switching from coal to gas, which does reduce emissions.

Renewable energy is still only 9% of the total energy supply. Another problem is the increasing demand for transport. Smaller, more efficient engines are failing to offset a 17% increase in vehicle numbers.

Rejecting Kyoto

The major political driver for reducing emissions since 1997 has been the Kyoto Protocol. Countries which made pledges to reduce emissions, principally those in the expanded European Union, have made most progress.

This is partly due to the economic recession and exporting some dirty industries to China and other developing countries, but domestic efficiency measures and switching to renewables has helped.

Among the worst performing countries are those that made pledges under the Kyoto Protocol and subsequently abandoned them for political reasons – the United States, Canada and Australia.

The top four countries in the per capita emissions table (the amount of CO2 emitted for each person in a country) has Australia in the lead and Luxembourg second, followed by the United States and Canada.

Positive note

Luxembourg makes the list only because of its low taxes on fuel, which mean that motorists from neighbouring countries fill up their cars at its petrol pumps and then drive back over the border.

Australia relies heavily on coal burning to power its industry and also exports large quantities of coal to China.

The new government turned its back on international efforts to combat climate change last year. Canada had previously done the same, deciding instead to exploit its tar sands for oil production, involving high-energy use.

The United States has high per capita carbon emissions because of the lavish lifestyles of its citizens and a powerful Republican lobby that supports the fossil fuel industry and blocks any attempt to combat climate change.

On what the OECD calls “a positive note”, its members have slashed emissions of sulphur oxides by 69% since 1990 and of nitrogen oxide by 36% in the same period.

Sulphur oxides, in various forms, are a chief cause of acid rain and a potent greenhouse gas. Nitrogen oxides are also a contributor to climate change and low level ozone, which damages plants and buildings and irritates human lungs.

These reductions have been possible because of political action, showing that it is not the lack of technology that prevents the world tackling climate change but the lack of will and legislation.

This article was produced by the Climate News Network

Related News

OECD chief: carbon price vital to address climate change 6 months ago

Are developing nations equally to blame for climate change? 7 months ago

Are carbon markets an effective way to address climate change? 1 year ago

Bangkok 2012 – Poorest nations issue plea for support in climate battle while richest accused of watering down ambition 1 year ago

  • Jack Wolf

    When I read about how we have experienced yet
    another climate record, or another quake undoubtedly caused by injection wells, or any of the many record breaking weather events of late, my heart sinks. And, they just keep coming on, and on, and on..

    I get this sickening pit at my bottom of my stomach that won’t go away. And, I fear that if I don’t do something, my punishment will be Al Gore haunting me in the afterlife. Forever and ever.

    Now, I just can’t let that happen, can I? He’s much too professorial
    to be much fun I’m sure, and when I die (most likely in a new record breaking
    beyond biblical climate event), I just want to have fun. So, no Al please, not
    that, anything but that.

    As such, I have decided to participate in the Great March for Climate Action that begins in March and comes to my state in October. I don’t want to go, I have better things to do, but I must and so I shall. It is for all of our sakes,the young and even the old at this point. And to get that Al out of my future dead head.

    http://climatemarch.org/