RTCC logo

EU proposes 40% carbon pollution cut by 2030

Climate package proposes new targets for emissions and renewables, but bruising member state talks beckons  

China_emissions_466

By John McGarrity

EU policymakers have proposed that the 28-nation bloc cuts its greenhouse emissions 40 percent by 2030 from 1990 levels, overcoming pressure from some member states and other Commissioners for a weaker 35% target.  

The 40% percent cut in greenhouse gases will be backed by a binding renewables EU-wide target of at least 27%,  the European Commission said in a statement.

“In spite of all those arguing that nothing ambitious would come out of the Commission today, we did it. A 40% emissions reduction is the most cost-effective target for the EU and it takes account of our global responsibility,” said EU climate chief Connie Hedegaard in a statement.

The proposed 40% target means the EU is the first major negotiator at UN climate talks to present a number on how much it will cut emissions after 2020.

The 2030 climate and energy framework also  aims provide greater clarity to investors on electricity generation by the end of the next decade, and how to curb rising energy prices.

However some member states will likely try to amend or scrap some of the proposals during the lengthy negotiation process, particularly measures that could lead to increases in power prices.

“Increasing the binding target for energy from renewables to 27% does not take into account the electricity price impact of this policy. Raising the CO2 reduction target to 40% is at best premature,” said Konrad Szymanski, a Polish co-rapporteur for the European Parliament’s industry and energy committee.

But some green groups and least developed countries have said that the deeper 40% carbon target is still highly inadequate, given that the EU is likely to achieve around 35% in greenhouse gas reductions by the middle of the next decade.

With the 35% figure omitted from the final document, the main source of compromise appears to be in the renewables target.

The EC had earlier suggested last year that a renewable energy target would be 30% with targets imposed on a national level but will now strive for 27% using a ‘bottom-up’ approach.

This appears to be a victory for EU countries such as the UK, which insisted they should have the freedom to use other forms of energy – such as nuclear and fossil fuels that use carbon capture and storage – to help cut carbon emissions.

Renewables target

However critics of an EU-wide renewables target said it was unenforceable in its current form and individual member states would face no sanction if they failed to pull their weight.

“The EU level renewables target is non-binding on Member States, and begs question how (these) can be met and what are consequences if not? ‘Legal’ is a relative term,” said Bryony Worthington, a member of the UK’s upper house of parliament and a campaigner for tough carbon targets.

In a press briefing, EC officials said that a requirement for 27% of energy to come from renewable sources would translate into 45% of electricity being generated from wind, solar and hydro and biomass.

But member states, particularly neighbouring countries, will have to agree on who does the heavy lifting in delivering an EU-wide target for the deployment of low-carbon electricity generation.

Interconnectors and modernised smart grids could help deliver electricity from parts of Europe where renewable energy is plentiful to those states that are overwhelmingly reliant on fossil fuels.

But such technology is expensive and EU countries will have to work out who picks up the tab.

Carbon markets

The EC also proposed today to reform the EU emissions trading scheme, including  a reserve from 2021 that would help to prevent crashes or spikes in prices.

A so-called EU carbon buffer could add 13 euros to the 2019-2030 carbon price, according to analysis by Reuters Point Carbon.

The EU’s executive said that a possible raising of energy efficiency in the EU would be examined more closely once a review of failed 2020 targets is concluded later in the year.

Over the next months member states are expected to publish detailed plans on how to use electricity and fuels less wastefully.

As expected, the EC agreed to drop earlier plans to bring in a slew of new laws to control Europe’s nascent shale gas industry.

But breaches of existing regulations on the resources industry could prompt additional regulations on fracking after an 18-month review.

“The communication balances the right of member states to exploit shale gas with need to draw up an EU-wide environmental  rules. This is not new legislation. We are not meddling in member states’ policies on how they want to generate energy,” European Commission President Jose Manuel Barosso told a press conference.

Timeline

On carbon capture and storage, the EC said member states with large shares of fossil fuel in their energy mix should take the lead in funding pilot projects so they can be deployed by the mid-2020s.

Even though policymakers in Brussels said that increased funding from EU carbon auctions could be on the table, adherents of the technology said today’s proposals didn’t go far enough to encourage a technology viewed as crucial if large emitters are to cut their emissions.

EU governments are likely to take 12-18 months to agree a final version of the 2030 climate and energy proposals that can be adopted as law.

Final approval by the EU institutions could take up to 2 years, meaning that the framework might not take legal effect until 2017.

Agreement on a GHG cut among member states will be needed by the spring of next year when countries have to submit future carbon reduction plans to the UN ahead of the Paris climate summit late in 2015.

Related News

EU bickering continues over 2030 climate targets 6 months ago

EU set to propose 40% carbon reduction target for 2030 6 months ago

EU heavyweights urge 40% greenhouse gas emissions cut by 2030 6 months ago

EU proposes 40% emissions cut for 2030 1 year ago

  • Robert Vincin

    For 20 yrs UNFCCC assembles with a passing parade of new governments’ figures and little comprehension on carbon cycle or the narrow array of vegetation to convert CO2e to soil soil-carbon. What is needed is leadership with hands-on expertise. The UN as a collective should unite relate CO2 build-up to poverty, desertification, and wars. Sequester CO2e into anthropogenic deserts grow soil, food, fodder and in time as soil grows, forestry. Well planned and managed via UN based emission trading accounting a recovery of desert impacted nations they store CO2 for 100yrs paid share of credit income. They restore self worth and the income they buy the Wests goods will see, bottom up recovery of global Banking. As I say well planned cost is about 00.5 GDP when you add no more aid food fodder for all and transpiration and other cycle back working.